Engineering, as commonly suspected, is to design and build certain products to meet certain needs.
Engineering a biological system is not much different. First, we shall identify our needs. The question of
What and Why should we build hit us way before the project started. We tried to locate a
significant topic
that can be solved by building a biological system. This year, after witnessing the deterioration of the
world situation, unusual climates appear much more frequently, and continuous fights for resources in many
areas, we chose to focus on energy issues and related climate issues.
As we have introduced in the project description, we plan to design a biological system, either based on
biological traits already present or create one from scratch, that can produce biofuels using microalgae
as chassis. Microalgae accumulate TAGs, an important storage lipid, to maintain energy homeostasis and
carbon storage. Attempts to use genome engineering to increase TAGs accumulation have been done for years,
however, there hasn't been much success due to the complexity of algal metabolic pathways.
Constructing a genome editing system for algae
Introduction and stimulation of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Chosen the chassis, the next step is to select genetic methods and engineer a matching system. Based on a
review named Innovations in improving lipid production : Algal chemical genetics by Nishikant Wase,
we
noticed that many attempts were done with overexpression of positive regulation genes in TAGs or fatty
acids synthesis pathways but few have tried to knock down or knock out positive regulation genes in
glucose synthesis pathways or TAGs degradation pathways. Combined with our careful investigation and
previous experience of the team, we supposed this is a good year for us to dive again into CRISPR system
to see what can we achieve. Among the large Cas protein family, we selected the S. pyogenes (Sp) Cas9
endonuclease as our gene-editing tool.
The moment we chose to use CRISPR/Ca9 system, we knew there was a problem that can not be neglected,
off-target. SpCas9 is directed to target sites based on complementarity to a complexed single-guide RNA
(sgRNA). However, SpCas9-sgRNA also binds and cleaves genomic off-targets with only partial
complementarity. To date, we lack the ability to predict cleavage and binding activity quantitatively and
rely on binary classification schemes to identify strong off-targets. Therefore, we had to construct a
model that could provide a quantitative assessment of the off-target effects of different sgRNAs to guide
and offer better choices on gRNAs so that we could know precisely which gRNAs to synthesize that could
make the most out of our transformation process and guarantee gene editing efficiency. Our modelling group
made a marvellous contribution to this matter.
They constructed a kinetic model based on thermodynamics
which can give more discriminative off-target scores for better differentiation of different gRNAs
compared to MIT and CFD scores. And the model we used can overcome the binary limitations of the previous
physics-based binary off-target predicting model and considers off-target effects with both high
possibility and low possibility. And an idea of accurately calculating the cleavage efficiency of a
certain sgRNA based on the Moran process is given by us.
The first wet lab attempt at CRISPR/Cas9 system
1. Plasmids design
Although we did suspect building a knock-out system targeting algae will be difficult, the available
results were still surprisingly insufficient. We selected a CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid designed to target
photoreceptor genes in Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii, according to Andre Greiner, as the foundation to
engineer our own parts. The origin design of the plasmid seems to perfectly fit our needs but we want to
insure all the parts are capable to fulfil our aim of knocking out different genes located in algal
nuclear genome in vivo. Therefore, we performed codon optimization, kept 2 different promoters for gRNAs,
and replaced reporter genes with mCherry and Staygold (a newly discovered highly photostable green
fluorescent protein). pTX2038 and pTX2040 are designed.
Figure 1. Structure of pTX2038 and pTX2040 plasmids.
2. Testing the designs
We chose the commonly used electronic transformation to transform pTX2038 and pTX2040 without cloning
specific gRNAs but remaining gRNAs inserting site into algae.
Figure 2. Selection and genetic editing efficiency of thaumatin-resistant colonies after
transformation.
(A) Growth of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in the plates after electrotransformation (7 days).
Negative
control : no plasmid was added. All dishes shown in the figure contain TAP medium supplemented with
25
µg/mL of Hyg, except for the positive control of the wild-type Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strain.
(B) Statistics of positive clones after transformation and the frequency of transformation.
Figure 3. Gel run of samples from colony PCR.
(A) Sequence comparison of Cas9, HgR, and mCherry fragments in pTX2038.
(B) Sequence alignment of Cas9, HgR, and StayGold fragments in pTX2040. M: 2000bp DNA
marker; NC: wildtype; PC: Linear plasmid. 1-3 indicate the different transformants
selected.
The brightness of PCR products of Hyg resistance gene, mCherry reporter gene, Cas9 protein and StayGold
reporter gene (Figure 3A and 3B) fragments were all consistent with the DNA bands of the positive
control
group as well as being matched with the position of DNA Marker, which indicates that the fragmented PCR
products transferred into the vector were in a high concentration and normal expression state. In sum, the
effectiveness of transformation could be testified.
To further demonstrate the correct insertion of the vector at the cellular expression level, we performed
microscopy whose centers were the autofluorescent genes contained in the construct vectors: mCherry and
StayGold. And autofluorescence in red of Chlorophyll was used as a negative control.
Figure 4. Images of WT Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and positive clones after transformation at
20×
magnification. WT: wild type; DIC: bright field. 60ms exposure time; Chlorophyll:
EX: Form 625nm to 650nm,
10ms exposure time; mCherry: EX: Form 515nm to 555nm, 300ms exposure time; StayGold: EX:
Form 465nm to
495nm, 300ms exposure time.
Compared with the wildtype, the cells of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with fluorescent reporter gene showed
different degrees of fluorescence and normal autofluorescence expression of chlorophyll, which further
proved that the vector could be expressed normally when transferred into Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Figure4).
Perfection of CRISPR/Cas9 system
We learned from this first attempt that transforming CRISPR plasmids into algae is not a smooth process. Our team tried a protocol that describes a method of transforming Chlamydomonas reinhardtii nuclear genome through electroporation. This scheme requires at least 3 days of work, which usually leads to small colonies within 1-2 weeks, but no single colony is successfully screened after many attempts. We struggled for months to get the result of the plasmids transformation. We began to question our design on the methods.
In order to improve the efficiency of electric conversion, we increased the amount of linear plasmid, improved the parameters of electroporation, and used electroporation buffer (ME Suc): MAX efficiency ™ Convert the reagent (Therfisher, # A24229) to make further attempts.
For the plasmids, we noticed that although we have successfully proved that Cas9 protein and the reporters were transformed into algae, we only had concrete test results on reporters. Cas9 protein hasn't had the chance to show its ability! We found that psy1 (phytoene synthase-1 gene, disruption of psy1 produces white colonies that are easy to detect and count) is a valuable and mind-blowing reporter gene which is an ideal in vivo target gene for us to attempt our first transformation towards Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
We used the tool called CRISPOR on the sgRNA design website, together with the off-target prediction model we constructed, to perform sgRNA design for psy1. The following are the test results on psy1 knock-out.
Figure 5. The phytoene synthase gene, PSY1, was chosen as a target gene. sgRNA transcription driven by Chlamydomonas U6 promoters (CrU6) was assayed.
Comparison between wildtype Chlamydomonas reinharditii and transformed positive clone of PSY1 gene in bright field(Figure 5).
Here, we provide a scheme to verify the successful introduction and proper operation of the CRISPR/Cas system by targeting the endogenous PSY1 gene for vector construction and transformation. Moreover, by microscopic bright-field comparison of the wild type with the PSY1 mutant, if the field of view turns white, the system could prove to be feasible.
4. Putting the system into practical use
According to previous research, scientists have found that algae accumulate more TAGs when they are cultured in deprived conditions such as nutrition deficiency, temperature or light treatment and many researchers have conducted transcriptome analysis towards those deprived treated algae. The most use one is nitrogen deprivation, which play an important role in regulating gene expression and metabolic pathway. Iron is also an essential micronutrient for all organisms and plays an important role in the growth and metabolism of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. However, research on iron stress in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is relatively blank. Therefore, we chose conventional stress - nitrogen stress and novel stress - iron stress among various stresses to observe their effects on the growth and lipid production of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. And we managed to identify several differential expressed genes (Table 1).
Table 1. Potential genes to promote lipid production in the four metabolic pathways.
Now we managed to find some target genes by our own approach but we couldn't neglect the fruits of previous generations so we browsed more than 50 relative papers to observe more important enzymes in algal metabolic pathways that may have huge impacts on TAPs accumulation. From previous research, we selected 7 genes from 5 different pathways as possible target genes and from our transcriptome analysis results we predicted 12 genes as possible targets (Figure 6). We shall knock out each of them using our engineering system and then test these mutants' growth conditions and TAGs accumulations.
Figure 6. The selected genes. The
blue
ones are reported genes and the
green
ones are the genes obtained by using transcriptome analysis.
We planned to continue drawing growth curves as done before, and use Nile red dying, lipid extraction and GC-MS to quantitively and qualitatively analyze TAG and fatty acids accumulation so that we could create engineered algae to produce a large amount of biofuel raw material in a fragmentation tank like a factory.
1. Eslami-Mossallam, B. et al. A kinetic model predicts SpCas9 activity, improves off-target classification, and reveals the physical basis of targeting fidelity. Nature communications 13, 1367, (2022).
2. Greiner, A. et al. Targeting of Photoreceptor Genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via Zinc-Finger Nucleases and CRISPR/Cas9. The Plant cell 29, 2498-2518 (2017).
3. Wase, N., Black, P. & DiRusso, C. Innovations in improving lipid production: Algal chemical genetics. Progress in lipid research 71, 101-123 (2018).