We've acknowledged everyone who contributed to our project in our attribution page. To access the project attribution page.
We've presented our project's purpose and journey to accomplish our project in the project Description page.
We've contributed to the iGEM parts registry, we've made a synbio dictionary, we made a bee dynamics model as well as making an interactive basis for it. For more details on what we left behind, click here.
We have collaborated with the iGEM Rochester team on both our wikis, we also colaborated with the paris Sacalay team for more details, click here.
Our success effort to reach our to our potential stakeholders are documented here.
Keeping our stakeholders in mind, we’ve developed a proposal for implementing our technology in beehives. We've described our plan in our Proposed Implementation page.
We have also talked with field experts about the implementation of our technology. The interview has been posted in our Integrated Human Practices page.
Out human practices work affected our project as a whole and as such it qualified us for the integrated human practices medal criterion. A big thank you to all that supported us throughout this project! Read more about it here.
Our models were used to guide our actions. We put a great deal of time and care into modelling what we thought was relevant to this project and to make the models representative of reality. This qualifiedd us for the Project modelling medal criterion. Read more about it here.
Our partnership with the Paris Saclay team to produce the synbio dictionary qualified us for the partnership medal criterion. Big thank you to the Paris Saclay team! Read more about it here.
During our project we put an emphasis on designing and working with safety as the priority. So much so that our work and our design were nominated for best lab safety. Read more about our lab safety here.