The Paraoxon Hydrolysis Detection Experiment
Insecticides are one of the most significant sources of organic phosphate
pollution in water bodies. As the active metabolite of organophosphate
insecticide, paraoxon could result in neurotoxic poisoning in animals. Our
implementation hardware included a filtering device that contains bacteria
engineered to overexpress the
oph
gene, which encodes the enzyme organophosphate hydrolase (OPH).
In order to prove the ability of OPH to hydrolyze and, thus, detoxify
paraoxon, we utilize the pNP sensor as the specified switch.
Biosensor Design
To determine the effect of the paraoxon hydrolysis reaction, we detected
the amount of the reaction’s product, p-nitrophenol (pNP) with the pNP
sensor. We designed the biosensor by transforming the pNP sensor plasmid
and enzyme plasmid into the biological system
E. coli
BL21(DE3). The enzyme plasmid contains the original lac operon and the
subcloned
oph
gene. The sensor plasmid contains the subcloned GFP (green fluorescent
protein) gene and pNP mut1-1 gene, which encodes for the transcription
factor protein to enhance downstream GFP expression when induced by pNP
(Jha et al. 8495).
Biosensor Function
The biosensor functions fully under exposure to both IPTG and paraoxon in
the environment. With the induction of IPTG, the repressor protein is
prevented from binding to the gene, allowing the transcription of the OPH
protein. OPH then hydrolyses paraoxon, producing p-nitrophenol (pNP),
which would bind to the activator protein pNP mut1-1, leading to the
increased transcription of the GFP protein and, thus, causing the emission
of green fluorescence (Jha et al. 8495). By measuring the intensity of GFP
fluorescence, we can detect the detoxification of paraoxon and the level
of inorganic phosphate production.
Fig. 1 The function of the whole-cell biosensor
Fig. 2 The construct and function of the pNP sensor plasmid
Experimental Methods
Experimental work 1: pNP Titration
To determine the standard curves for the positive correlation between pNP
and GFP fluorescence intensity for further experiments, we titrated E.
coli BL21 (DE3) carrying pNP sensor with varying concentrations of pNP.
The concentrations and the resulting fluorescence intensity are mapped out
as the standard curve for experimental references.
Experimental work 2: Paraoxon Hydrolysis
Experimental work 2: Paraoxon Hydrolysis
E. coli
BL21 (DE3) carrying pET22b::OPH in presence of IPTG is treated with
paraoxon. The rate of paraoxon hydrolysis by OPH can be calculated from
the pNP production to prove the target protein's effectiveness.
Experimental Results, Learning, and Redesign
The data of the preliminary experiment, which aimed to test the
transcriptional factor induced by pNP, showed no significance. The results
were inconsistent with the research paper on which the experimental design
was based. For more information on the engineering of the pNP sensor gene,
please visit the
Engineering Success page
.
DH5alpha
24870
DH5alpha + pNP
20650
DH5alpha-sensor
46867
DH5alpha-sensor + pNP
50783
Fig. 3 Green fluorescence detection in
E. coli
BL21 (DE3) and pNP sensor cell in absence and presence of pNP.
Therefore, we redesigned a more direct method to test the degradation of
paraoxon by OPH. The experimental design was based on the hypothesis that
paraoxon (transparent) would be hydrolyzed to produce diethyl phosphate
(transparent) and pNP (yellow, absorbance peak at 410 nm by
spectrophotometry). We detected the production level of pNP with
spectrophotometry to test the percentage of paraoxon degradation by OPH
that could hydrolyze in a certain period of time. We performed two
experimental works: the amount of pNP detection at the various time points
(pNP conc. v.s. Time) and in the presence of different IPTG concentrations
at a fixed time (pNP conc. v.s. IPTG conc.), respectively, to determine
the optimal factors of OPH degradation activity.
Preliminary Experiment
To ensure the function of OPH before introducing other variables and
performing complete experiments with all control groups, we designed and
conducted a preliminary experiment. 3 groups of BL21 (DE3) bacteria and 3
groups of BL21 (DE3) bacteria engineered with OPH gene are cultured with
medium only as the negative control, paraoxon, and pNP, respectively. The
engineered bacteria are then induced by IPTG for protein expression. To
test if the products of the hydrolysis reaction would be released into the
environment, we measured the samples from the bacterial suspension and
supernatant after centrifugation. We then deducted the background data
(negative control) from the absorbance and divided the result by the
optical density of the bacteria to test the level of pNP produced (and,
therefore, the paraoxon degraded) per 10^7 CFU of bacteria added,
indicating the ability of paraoxon degradation by each bacteria.
1. BL2(DE3) (negative control)
0
0
2. BL2(DE3) +paraoxon (experimental)
0.2323266987
0.3905284832
3. BL2(DE3) +pNP (positive control)
8.905950096
9.966890595
4. PET::OPH +IPTG induction (negative control)
0
0
5. PET::OPH +paraoxon +IPTG induction (experimental)
6.720481928
6.916144578
6. PET::OPH +pNP +IPTG induction (positive control)
11.83912249
12.51005484
Preliminary Experiment Results and Interpretation
The absorbance of the paraoxon solution increased 6.720481928 A.U.
(highlighted in green) after the reaction with BL21 (DE3) engineered with
the
oph
gene, whereas that of the paraoxon solution reacted with BL21(DE3) only
increased 0.2323266987 A.U. (highlighted in green). The significant
increase in the production of pNP proves the ability of our target protein
OPH to hydrolyze paraoxon. Based on the successful results of our
preliminary experiment, we further designed experimental works 1 and 2 to
investigate the optimal reaction time and IPTG induction level,
respectively, that would allow OPH to reach its highest enzyme expression
and activity.
Standard Curve Preparation
After observing that reaction with bacteria alters the absorbance of pNP
solution significantly, we constructed a standard curve that measures the
absorbance at 410 nm versus the concentration of pNP solution cultured
with 0.6 O.D. bacteria for 6 hours.
Fig. 4 Standard Curve (410 absorbances v.s. pNP concentration)
Experimental Work 1: pNP concentration v.s. Time
We aimed to test the optimal reaction time for OPH enzyme activity with
experimental work 1. All solutions are prepared with 500 μM PXN/pNP
chemical, 100 μM IPTG, and 0.6 O.D . bacteria. The experimental groups are
designed as below:
1 (positive control)
BL21(DE3)
pNP
induced
2 (negative control)
PXN
uninduced
3 (experimental group)
PXN
induced
4 (positive control)
BL21(DE3) engineered with OPH
pNP
induced
5 (negative control)
PXN
uninduced
6 (experimental group)
PXN
induced
The absorbance at the wavelength of 410 nm and 600 nm in each group was
measured after 1 hr, 2 hrs, 3 hrs, 4 hrs, 5 hrs, 6 hrs, and 24 hrs of
reaction to test the pNP production level and the concentration of
bacteria over time.
Experimental 1 Results and Interpretation
Fig. 5 Time (hr) v.s. pNP concentration (μM)
The result of experimental work 1 shows that pNP concentration increases
rapidly in the first 5 hours and grows steadily afterward.
Experimental Work 2: pNP concentration v.s. IPTG concentration
We aimed to determine the optimal concentration of IPTG induction for OPH
enzyme expression with experimental work 2. Solutions are prepared with
500 μM PXN/pNP chemical, 0.6 O.D. bacteria, and various concentrations of
IPTG. The experimental groups are designed as below:
1 (negative control)
BL21(DE3)
-
0
2 (positive control)
pNP
0
3 (experimental group)
PXN
0
4 (negative control)
BL21(DE3) engineered with OPH
-
0
5 (positive group)
pNP
0
6 (experimental group)
PXN
0
7 (experimental group)
PXN
2000
8 (experimental group)
PXN
1000
9 (experimental group)
PXN
500
10 (experimental group)
PXN
250
11 (experimental group)
PXN
125
12 (experimental group)
PXN
62.5
13 (experimental group)
PXN
31.25
14 (experimental group)
PXN
15.625
The absorbance values at the wavelength of 410 nm and 600 nm were measured
after 6 hrs and 23 hrs of reaction to test the pNP production level and
the concentration of bacteria with increasing concentration of IPTG.
Experimental Work 2 Results and Interpretation
Fig. 6 IPTG induction (μM) vs. pNP concentration after 23 hours (μM)
The results of experimental work 2 demonstrated that after 23 hours, the
experimental group induced by 250 μM IPTG reached the highest level of pNP
concentration, thus proving that 250 μM IPTG is the optimal induction for
the highest OPH protein expression.
Inorganic Phosphate Detection Experiments
Inorganic phosphate (Pi) accumulated in the sediments of aquatic
environments is the primary reason for eutrophication. In order to
decrease the amount of inorganic phosphate in water bodies, our team
implemented a device that contains specially engineered
E. coli
that expresses the RNA of antisense PhoU (AsPhoU) thus hindering the
expression of PhoU and enhancing phosphate transportation. Through our
engineering process, these bacterial bodies can absorb more Pi from the
environment.
Bacterial System for Cellular Inorganic Phosphate (Pi) Concentration
Regulation
PstSCAB is a high-affinity phosphate transporter protein in
E. coli
. Pho regulon is a common bacterial regulatory system determining and
managing intracellular Pi concentration through the regulation of the
PstSCAB transporter protein. The regulon consists of a histidine kinase
sensor protein – PhoR – on the inner membrane and a response regulator –
PhoB – on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane of a prokaryotic cell. The
way PhoB regulates the simultaneous expression of PstSCAB and PhoA depends
on the process by which PhoU binds onto PhoR. PhoU, a metal-binding
protein, detects the intracellular concentration levels of Pi. When the
environment undergoes a decrease in Pi concentration, PhoU dissociates
from PhoR and the PstSCAB transporter. This, in turn, promotes the
transportation of Pi and increases PhoA expression, which absorbs more Pi
into the cell and enhances the phosphorylation of PhoB. On the other hand,
when the phosphate level is high, PhoU would be activated to block its
absorption, meaning that the transportation by the PstSCAB protein and the
expression of PhoA would be inhibited.
Fig. 1 Phosphate limitation; PstSCAB active; PhoR kinase inactive (left)
and Phosphate sufficiency; PstSCAB inactive; PhoR kinase active (right)
(Devine)
Theoretical Function of AsPhoU
A previously published paper demonstrates that PhoU knockout leads to a
halt
E. coli
growth (Haldimann). Therefore, we designed the mRNA for AsPhoU hindering
phoU expression to increase the amount of Pi that bacteria could
transport, thus lowering the concentration of Pi in aquatic environments.
AsPhoU cell expresses antisense PhoU RNA under arabinose-control promoter
(pBAD) and thus binds to the mRNA of PhoU, hindering ribosome binding to
decrease phoU translation. The inhibition of PhoU protein would allow the
PstSCAB transporter to be open for Pi transportation at all times, even
under the high concentration of phosphate in eutrophic water bodies.
Fig. 2 Normal PhoU protein function (left) and the inhibition of PhoU by
AsPhoU, as well as its downstream effects (right)
With the purpose of proving the effectiveness of our engineered
E. coli
in decreasing the concentration of inorganic phosphate (Pi) in the
environment, 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate coloration and malachite
green coloration are used.
Preliminary Experiment: 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (XP)
Coloration Test of Pho Regulon
Experimental Design
To ensure the effectiveness and practicality of our aforementioned
experimental design, we conducted a preliminary experiment.
5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (XP) is a chromogenic substrate that
shows no color in its stable state. However, if XP is in contact with
PhoA, PhoA will hydrolyze XP, thus severing phosphate ions (a phosphate
monoester + water = 5,5′-dibromo-4,4′-dichloro-indigo + a phosphate ion),
and the remaining chemical will appear to be blue. Once an increase in the
concentration of Pi is detected, the expression of PhoA rises and turns
the XP solution blue. To test the function of our bacteria engineered with
AsPhoU, we placed it inside the XP chemical to determine the absorbance of
Pi by observing the color changes.
Experimental Results and Interpretation
Our positive control group is
E. coli
DH5α in a low phosphate medium, which turns the XP solution blue,
reflecting low phosphate to induce PhoA expression. On the contrary, no
blue color was observed in a high phosphate medium.
E. coli
DH5α
Low phosphate
Blue
E. coli
DH5α (withAsPhoU)
Low phosphate
Blue
E. coli
DH5α (with AsPhoU) + arabinose
Low phosphate
Blue
E. coli
DH5α
High phosphate
Transparent
E. coli
DH5α (with AsPhoU)
High phosphate
Transparent
E. coli
DH5α (with AsPhoU) + arabinose
High phosphate
Blue
After the addition of
E. coli
DH5α (with AsPhoU) with 0.2 % arabinose at a high phosphate concentration,
the XP solution turned blue, proving the expression of PhoA and, thus, the
transportation of Pi into the bacterial cells.
Malachite Green Coloration
Experimental Design
Once molybdate (MoO₄⁻²) comes into contact with phosphate (PO₄⁻³), a
complex containing phosphomolybdic acid would usually form. This complex
interacts with malachite, forming a green chromogenic complex that remains
in its most stable phase in an acidic environment. The color formation
runs proportional to the increase of phosphate concentration. The shifts
in color could determine the absorbance at 620 nm by a spectrophotometer.
We would add the aforementioned chemical into our bacteria to interpret
the effectiveness of our engineering method.
Standard Curve Preparation
Our team constructed a standard curve that measures the absorbance at 620
nm versus the concentration of phosphate solution in the presence of E.
coli of 0.1 O.D.
Fig. 3 Standard Curve (620 nm absorbance vs phosphate conc.)
Experimental Work 1: Time versus Pi Concentration
We aimed to test the optimal time of our engineered
E. coli
functioning under different conditions. All simulated high phosphate
solutions are prepared with 2 mM of K₂HPO₄, 0.06% glucose, and MOPS
buffer; all simulated low phosphate solutions are prepared with 0.1 mM of
K₂HPO₄, 0.4% glucose, and MOPS buffer.
We incubated our engineered
E. coli
(cultured at 0.1 O.D.) under the same condition, added malachite and
molybdate into our
E. coli
colonies, and detected the absorbance at 600 and 620 nm, respectively,
reflecting cell density and inorganic phosphate (Pi) concentration at
different time points. Using the standard curve above, we translated the
detected data of absorbance at 620 nm into phosphate concentration in μM.
Experimental Results and Interpretation
Experiments on the bacterial body containing AsPhoU in the presence or
absence of arabinose were conducted for the level of phosphate absorption.
The groups with arabinose induction clearly reported higher absorbed
phosphate concentrations as AsPhoU is expressed. More phosphate absorption
in presence of arabinose was observed compared to the absence of arabinose
in AsPhoU. The maximal amount of Pi absorption was 3.1 x 10-6 μM per CFU
(colony forming unit) for 1-hour culture, estimating 2.52 mM phosphate
absorption per OD.
The full set experimental bar graph (1, 2, 3 hrs) indicating efficiency
are illustrated below:
Fig. 4 Phosphate content per CFU versus different experimental sets
Polyphosphate (PolyP) Detection Experiments
Concluding from the previous experiments, AsPhoU cell has proven its
effectiveness in absorbing a higher amount of Pi in the environment. While
acknowledging that, we simultaneously have to make sure that the absorbed
Pi constructively fixates into inorganic polyphosphate (polyP) so that it
remains inside the bacterial bodies. Henceforth our team utilized
Sigma-Aldrich’s PolyP assay kit, which helped in quantifying the amount of
PolyP in bacterial bodies.
Theoretical Function of our Assay Kit
PolyP reacts fully with the fluorescent dye provided by the assay kit,
forming a detectable complex. The fluorescence of the created complex is
then measured with a spectrophotometer at λ (excitation) = 415 nm and λ
(emission) = 550 nm. The amount of fluorescence detected runs proportional
to the concentration of PolyP in the sampled bacteria.
Standard Curve Preparation
Our team constructed a standard curve with the diluted PolyP solution and
our assay buffer. The experimental groups are listed below:
1
0 uL
50 uL
0
2
5 uL
45 uL
50
3
10 uL
40 uL
100
4
14 uL
35 uL
150
5
20 uL
30 uL
200
6
25 uL
25 uL
250
Fig. 5 Standard Curve (PolyP conc. vs. fluorescence intensity)
Future plan
Owing to time constraints, we have not been able to test the ability of
AsPhoU for intracellular PolyP accumulation. Regardless, we would conduct
this experimental process in the future, with the hope of reiterating that
our proposed solution successfully operates. Moreover, we would subclone
oph and AsPhoU to pACYCDuet vector with p15A ori, compatible with PolyP
sensor carrying pMB ori to generate our PolyP sensor cell in this project.
References
Jha, Ramesh K., et al. “A Microbial Sensor for Organophosphate Hydrolysis
Exploiting an Engineered Specificity Switch in a Transcription Factor.”
Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, no. 17, 2016, pp. 8490–500. Crossref,
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw687.
Devine, Kevin M. “Activation of the PhoPR-Mediated Response to Phosphate
Limitation Is Regulated by Wall Teichoic Acid Metabolism in Bacillus
subtilis.” Frontiers in microbiology vol. 9 2678. 6 Nov. 2018,
doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02678
Haldimann, A et al. “Use of New Methods for Construction of Tightly
Regulated Arabinose and Rhamnose Promoter Fusions in Studies of the
Escherichia coli Phosphate Regulon.” Journal of bacteriology vol. 180,5
(1998): 1277-86. doi:10.1128/JB.180.5.1277-1286.1998