PROJECT

Design

Introduction


The problem we are looking to solve is how to engineer wheat plants that have an increased tolerance to heat stress. We propose to do this by genetically engineering the plants to carry genes that code for proteins that confer greater heat and drought tolerance to the plants. This section describes plant responses to heat stress as well as our proposed genetic engineering solution.

Project Pipeline
Our 2022 project design. We first designed our genetic constructs, then as a proof of concept, expressed them under heat stress in protoplasts. Lastly, our project implementation involved creating heat-resistant crops through an entire plant transformation with agrobacterium.


Heat Shock Response


Proteins folded into their functional conformation are said to be in their native state. Proper protein folding depends on many factors including temperature, pH, and presence of cofactors. At higher temperatures, molecules have greater kinetic energy which can disrupt the intermolecular interactions that keep proteins folded in their native state. When proteins are no longer properly folded, they can become non-functional, which can have serious effects on the cell and even cause cell death.

Chaperones are a class of proteins that help other proteins fold properly and achieve their native state. The type of chaperones that help proteins fold when temperatures rise are heat shock proteins (HSPs). HSPs are activated by the binding of cis-acting regulatory elements (heat shock elements or HSEs), near the promoters of HSPs, to trans-acting regulatory factors called heat shock factors (HSFs), which increases the transcription of HSP genes.

Heat Shock Proteins
HSFs, HSEs, and HSPs help maintain proper protein folding at increased temperatures.


Heat Stress in Wheat


Heat stress occurs when plants experience higher than ideal temperatures. At higher temperatures, cell membranes have increased membrane fluidity, proteins have reduced stability, and structural changes can occur in chromatin[1]. These changes at the cellular level can lead to many negative effects on overall plant health[2].

Some of the negative effects of heat stress in wheat include:

  • poor seed germination
  • decrease in grain filling duration
  • reduction in grain number per head
  • deactivation of the RuBisCO enzyme
  • decrease in photosynthetic capacity
  • premature leaf senescence
  • decrease in chlorophyll content
  • decreased crop yield


Heat-Inducible Promoters


Genes are expressed through transcription by RNA polymerase. RNA polymerase first binds to promoters before transcribing the coding and non-coding sequences of the gene. Some promoters are constitutive, meaning RNA polymerase can bind under any condition, and thus the promoters and corresponding genes are continuously active. Other promoters require specific conditions for RNA polymerase to bind. The promoters we will be working with are heat-inducible promoters. Heat shock factors must first bind to the heat shock element in order to recruit RNA polymerase to the promoter. After RNA polymerase binds to the promoter, transcription of our target genes can proceed.

Heat-Inducible Promoters
The conditional logic underlying our heat-inducible circuits.


ACC Deaminase


Protein Function: 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase (ACCD) breaks down 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC), an ethylene precursor, into α-ketobutyrate and ammonia[3]. Ethylene is a plant hormone involved in the stress response pathway of plants, including for heat stress[4]. At low levels (10 g/L), ethylene can promote growth, but at high levels (>25 g/L), ethylene can slow and even stop root and shoot growth[3].

ACC & ACCD Reaction Scheme
Aminocyclopropane carboxylate (ACC) metabolism.

In response to stresses, like high temperature, ethylene is synthesized and initiates a signal cascade that leads to the activation of several genes through transcription factors known as ethylene response factors or ERFs[5]. Genetically engineered plants with reduced ethylene receptors (decreased ethylene sensitivity) have been shown to have longer lasting flowers and slower fruit ripening[4]. Inhibiting the ethylene pathway in heat-shocked wheat plants has been shown to reduce the number of kernel abortions and inhibit the reduction in kernel weight[6].

Ethylene Hormone Signaling in Plants
Ethylene hormone signalling in plants.

Regulation: ACCD expression and enzyme activity is directly induced by its substrate ACC, but also other amino acids (L-alanine, DL-alanine, D-serine). ACCD is competitively inhibited by L-isomers of amino acids (L-alanine, L-serine, L-homoserine, L-α aminobutyric acid). The ACCD gene is negatively regulated by leucine, which is synthesized from α-ketobutyrate. Pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) is a cofactor of ACCD[3].

Production: Plant-associated bacteria synthesize ACCD which helps lower the ethylene content in plants[3]. High ethylene concentration reduces plant growth, so these microbes help the plants grow under stressful conditions.

Protein Structure: ACCD is a protein of weight 105-112 kDa depending on the species[3]. In its native state, the ACCD protein can be found in a homodimer or homotrimer structure.

PyMOL visualization of the ACCD enzyme and substrates. Shown are carbon chains (silver), water molecules (red), the active site region (orange), the ACC (cyan) and PLP (yellow) ligands, as well as polar contacts with Angstrom measurements (yellow).


SBPase


Protein Function: SBPase is a phosphatase enzyme in the Calvin Cycle that removes a phosphate group from sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphate (S1,7BP) to produce sedoheptulose 7-phosphate (S7P). The Calvin Cycle is the light-independent portion of photosynthesis that fixes carbon dioxide to produce three carbon sugars (DHAP) that will eventually form glucose.

SBPase Reaction Scheme
The Calvin Cycle in plants with key steps shown. Enzymes are highlighted in orange, key intermediates are in green, and their structures drawn. The reaction catalyzed by SBPase is shown, as is the homologous reaction catalyzed by FBPase.

Regulation: Increased production of SBPase in plants has shown to lead to increased photosynthesis and starch accumulation, in regular conditions and when plants are under cold stress[7, 8]. Increasing SBPase copy number has been shown to improve photosynthesis rate and increase seed size in wheat[9]. SBPase is regulated by pH (inhibited at lower pH), divalent cation (Mg2+) concentrations, and light (through a ferredoxin chain). At 400 ppm CO2 (the [CO2 in the atmosphere]), there is no excess of SBPase, unlike other enzymes in the Calvin Cycle, so altering its concentration can greatly affect yields[10].

Protein Structure: SBPase is encoded in the nuclear genome of plants and is synthesized in the cytosol. The protein is translated with an N-terminal extension, known as the transit peptide, which directs the enzyme to the chloroplast. In its native state the SBPase protein is a homodimer. The SPBase protein in wheat has 393 amino acids.

PyMOL visualization of the SBPase enzyme. Shown are carbon chains (green), the actives sites for the imidazole (magenta) and phosphate ion (orange) ligands in cyan and pink respectively, oxygen (red) and water (silver) molecules, as well as polar contacts with Angstrom measurements (yellow).


Choline Monooxygenase


Protein Function: Choline monooxygenase (CMO) is one enzyme in the plant pathway that synthesizes glycine betaine (GB). CMO converts choline into betaine aldehyde which is then converted to GB by betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase. GB maintains high ionic strength and helps drive protein folding. CMO is an enzyme already expressed in wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants[11].

Choline Monooxygenase and Glycine Betaine Pathway
Glycine betaine synthesis from choline in plants. Enzymes are highlighted in orange, key intermediates are in green, and their structures drawn.

Tobacco plants with engineered high levels of GB from increased copies of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase were shown to have greater heat tolerance[12]. Arabidopsis thaliana transformed with the bacterial version of CMO was also shown to have higher GB levels and increased tolerance to heat stress[13].

Regulation: Ferredoxin is a cofactor of CMO, thus the CMO reaction is oxygen and quinone dependent.

Protein Structure: CMO is 65 kDa and 556 amino acids long. CMO has homologues in bacteria and animal species.

PyMOL visualization of the CMO enzyme. Shown is the AlphaFold structure with carbon chains (silver) and active site candidates (cyan).


Gene Circuits & Construct Development


We designed four different constructs:

  1. The first was a control construct that included a constitutively active promoter (CaMV35S) and the gene for a green fluorescent protein (GFP).
  2. The second construct contained a heat-inducible promoter (TaHsp70d), the SBPase gene, and the gene for a red fluorescent protein (IRFP) in frame with the SBPase gene. This means that the SBPase and IRFP genes will be transcribed and translated into one polypeptide.
  3. The third construct also contained the TaHsp70d promoter, the ACCD gene, and the gene for a blue fluorescent protein (BFP) in frame with ACCD.
  4. The final construct contained the TaHsp70d promoter, the CMO gene, and the gene for a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) in frame with CMO.
Our 4 Gene Circuits
Our project’s genetic constructs. Arrows are used to represent promoters, boxes are used to represent proteins of interest, and the plasmid backbone is represented by the loop.

The CaMV35S promoter was selected because it can be used to express genes in a variety of plant species, including wheat which is the model organism of this project. It is also a constitutive promoter which means that it is always “ON”, the genes downstream of it are always being expressed. The CaMV35S promoter is widely used in plant studies, and is very well-characterized by previous studies[14].

The heat-inducible promoter we will be using for our project is TaHsp70d. We chose this promoter because it is found in wheat, so it will be recognized by RNA polymerase in our final product, a transgenic wheat plant. This specific wheat promoter was chosen because it is heat-inducible (downstream genes will only be expressed at higher temperatures) and it has higher transcription levels than other known wheat heat-inducible promoters[15]. The transcription factor that binds to this promoter to activate downstream gene expression is TaHsf2Ab.

The promoter is most active after 1.5 hours of being exposed to 36°C temperatures. It is useful for the promoter to be heat-inducible because then the genes we are introducing into the plant will only be active at higher temperatures, reducing unwanted effects at lower temperatures. We will be testing the expression of our own constructs under the control of this promoter in protoplasts.

The GFP construct is a positive control. We expected GFP to be transcribed and translated in E. coli and in protoplasts at all times, even in the absence of heat stress. If the protein is properly translated, it will fluoresce. The absence of fluorescence indicates an error in transcription, translation, or transfection. It also serves to normalize for transfection efficiency when compared to the other plasmid transfections.

All constructs were built independently in Escherichia coli and then individually transfected into protoplasts. Four different fluorescent protein genes were selected so we could determine which proteins were being transcribed under heat stress and we could measure how much gene expression changes for each protein under heat stress.

The four fluorescent proteins (GFP, RFP, YFP, and BFP) were intentionally chosen due to little overlap in their emission spectra. This is important because it would allow us to, in theory, co-transfect all the circuits into one protoplast, and reliably evaluate the expression of all the different genes (ACCD, SBPase, CMO) simultaneously. Though this wasn't done during our actual wet-lab work, it would be a valuable next step.

Emission Spectra
Fluorescent emission spectra of proteins RFP, YFP, GFP, and BFP. Their respective peak absorbances are 584, 527, 507, and 457 nm.


Protoplasts & Proof of Concept


Our genetic constructs were first constructed in E. coli, isolated and purified, then transfected into protoplasts. Protoplasts are plant cells that have had their cell walls digested. The cell walls of plants are made of cellulose which are cross-linked sugar molecules. Protoplasts can be made by treating plant cells to a cellulase enzyme that degrades the cellulose cell wall. Protoplasts are easier to transform and transfect than normal plant cells. The cell wall can reduce the efficiency of a transformation and transfection.

Protoplasts are conducive to both transient and stable transformation, and regeneration of whole plants from protoplasts is well researched [16, 17]. Protoplasts are also useful for specific gene editing experiments with techniques like CRISPR-Cas9[16].

Protoplast Isolation & Transfection
Protoplast experiment workflow: planting seedlings, protoplast isolation, transfection, and then heat shock experiments.

By transfecting wheat protoplasts with our constructs, we tested our genetic circuits in wheat cells under heat stress. We can demonstrate that our constructs were successfully synthesized, and that the expression of ACCD and SBPase can be induced in wheat cells under heat stress by measuring the fluorescence from the protoplasts after heat shock.

We were unable to transform entire wheat plants and create a transgenic line of wheat due to time and resource restrictions. However, by demonstrating that our genetic system works in wheat protoplasts this shows a proof of concept that we would be able to confer increased heat tolerance to entire wheat plants.



[1] Bita, C. E., & Gerats, T. (2013). Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Frontiers in plant science, 4, 273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00273

[2] Poudel, P. & Poudel, M. (2020). Heat Stress Effects and Tolerance in Wheat: A Review. Journal of biology and today’s world, 9, 217.

[3] Singh, R. P., Shelke, G. M., Kumar, A., & Jha, P. N. (2015). Biochemistry and genetics of ACC deaminase: A weapon to “stress ethylene” produced in plants. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00937

[4] Binder B. M. (2020). Ethylene signaling in plants. The Journal of biological chemistry, 295(22), 7710–7725. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.REV120.010854

[5] Müller, M., & Munné-Bosch, S. (2015). Ethylene Response Factors: A Key Regulatory Hub in Hormone and Stress Signaling. Plant physiology, 169(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00677

[6] Hays, D. B., Do, J. H., Mason, R. E., Morgan, G., & Finlayson, S. A. (2007). Heat stress induced ethylene production in developing wheat grains induces kernel abortion and increased maturation in a susceptible cultivar. Plant Science, 172(6), 1113–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.03.004

[7] Ding, F., Wang, M., Zhang, S., & Ai, X. (2016). Changes in sbpase activity influence photosynthetic capacity, growth, and tolerance to chilling stress in transgenic tomato plants. Scientific Reports, 6(1).

[8] Dunford, R.P., Durrant, M.C., Catley, M.A., & Dyer, T.A. (2004). Location of the redox-active cysteines in chloroplast sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase indicates that its allosteric regulation is similar but not identical to that of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. Photosynthesis Research, 58, 221-230.

[9] Driever, S. M., Simkin, A. J., Alotaibi, S., Fisk, S. J., Madgwick, P. J., Sparks, C. A., Jones, H. D., Lawson, T., Parry, M. A., & Raines, C. A. (2017). Increased SBPase activity improves photosynthesis and grain yield in wheat grown in greenhouse conditions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1730), 20160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0384

[10] Lefebvre, S., Lawson, T., Fryer, M., Zakhleniuk, O. V., Lloyd, J. C., & Raines, C. A. (2005). Increased sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase activity in transgenic tobacco plants stimulates photosynthesis and growth from an early stage in development. Plant Physiology, 138(1), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.055046

[11] Annunziata, M. G., Ciarmiello, L. F., Woodrow, P., Dell’Aversana, E., & Carillo, P. (2019). Spatial and temporal profile of glycine betaine accumulation in plants under abiotic stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00230

[12] Yang, X., Liang, Z., & Lu, C. (2005). Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycine betaine enhances photosynthesis against high temperature stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant physiology, 138(4), 2299–2309. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.063164

[13] Alia, A., Hayashi, H., Sakamoto, A., & Murata, N. (1998). Enhancement of the tolerance of Arabidopsis to high temperatures by genetic engineering of the synthesis of glycine betaine. The Plant Journal, 16(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00284.x

[14] Amack, S. C., & Antunes, M. S. (2020). CaMV35S promoter – A plant biology and biotechnology workhorse in the era of synthetic biology. Current Plant Biology, 24, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100179

[15] Xue, G. P., Sadat, S., Drenth, J., & McIntyre, C. L. (2014). The heat shock factor family from Triticum aestivum in response to heat and other major abiotic stresses and their role in regulation of heat shock protein genes. Journal of experimental botany, 65(2), 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert399

[16] Brandt, K. M., Gunn, H., Moretti, N., & Zemetra, R. S. (2020). A Streamlined Protocol for Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Protoplast Isolation and Transformation With CRISPR-Cas Ribonucleoprotein Complexes. Frontiers in plant science, 11, 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00769

[17] He, D. G., Yang, Y. M., & Scott, K. J. (1992). Plant regeneration from protoplasts of wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Hartog). Plant cell reports, 11(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231832