Implementation is the process of taking scientific findings and applying them to the real world to improve our communities and ecosystems. Since important freshwater ecosystems worldwide have been severely impacted by anthropogenic eutrophication, there has been a shift in public opinion regarding the acceptance of bioremediation solutions. However, there are issues that need to be resolved when supporting the implementation of a genetically modified organism solution into a natural environment. Through consultations with stakeholders, experts, and authorities knowledgeable in freshwater conservation, we were able to design a strategy for our project's implementation.
Figure 1. Our project's components
Remote Control Boat
A semi-autonomous marine vessel that uses distributed ledger technology with an integrated Arduino Mega microprocessor and GPS, equipped with pH and dissolved oxygen (DO) sensors as well as microcystin predictor. Its hull is 3D printed and its construction material, polylactic acid (PLA), is environmentally friendly and produced from sugar beet, tapioca leaves or soybeans. Minimum 5 years lifespan, 1 year guarantee provided.
Platform
Artificial floating island, fully biodegradable and environmentally friendly made of mycelium, which is a combination of fungi parts with biomass from agricultural by-products, which supports the growth of macrophytes. The protection of the platform from corrosion is achieved through the use of a special insulating material, 100% natural,which constitutes a special mixture of resin and oils from local plants. The product has a maximum 3 years lifespan by annually monitoring the corrosion suffered with the possibility of additional application of the insulating material in the following years and 12 months guarantee provided.
Genetically Engineered Phragmites australis Plants
In the presence of microcystins, a family of toxins generated by cyanobacteria in eutrophic habitats, the plants will increase the absorption of inorganic phosphorus via their roots and store it in their shoots and leaves, decreasing the levels of Pi in the eutrophic water.
Protective Mesh made of 100% recycled PET Bottles
It stands out thanks to weather resistance, UV resistance, and durability. The above characteristics were necessary so that the mesh would not tear easily and would not corrode when applied to water.
Water Filter
Incorporated into the mesh to reduce the possibility of root escaping and subsequent GM plant proliferation. Commonly used fibers are rayon, polyester and polypropylene. Typical filter media are produced in weights from 0.5 to 2.5 ounces per square yard.Common applications include filtration of metal machining coolants, oil or wastewater. Indicatively.
Mesh
Cellulose mesh (100% biobased) to cover the upper part of the plant thus that pollen from the genetically modified plant is kept under control.
Design Aspect | CFW | RC Boat |
---|---|---|
1. Performance |
|
|
2. Cost |
|
|
3. Environment |
|
|
4. Life in Service |
|
|
5. Maintanance |
|
|
6. Weight |
|
|
7. Geometry and Size |
|
|
8. Materials |
|
|
9. Standards and Specifications |
|
|
10. Manufacturing Facility |
|
|
The common reed, also known as Phragmites australis, is a monocotyledonous angiosperm that is native to Greece1 and has been shown to reduce pollution levels in freshwaters during several studies. Notably, the common reed is one of the few plants, along with Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia, that has been successfully applied and tested in CFWs in Greece. Phragmites a Australis has various advantages, including its "natural filter" reputation, rapid growth, and cost - effectiveness. Due to its extensive geographical range, which extends from cold temperate regions to wetland areas of the hot and humid tropics2, we know that it is very adaptable to a variety of situations (ie. soils with different pH, salinity, fertility and textures as well as different climatic conditions). Therefore, P. australis is an attractive option, not just for use in Greece but also across the world, turning our idea into a universal platform for aquatic environment bioremediation.
Site selection is the first step for the implementation of our research to the real world. Floating wetland constructions may be situated in rivers, lakes, or in reservoirs. They should be placed in areas where flows are generally slow and where there is permanent water3.
Lakes /off Channel Area / River Deltas
Restoring rivers and lakes benefits everyone by improving flood protection and ecological function, providing recreational opportunities, and enhancing urban quality of life. CFWs can be installed on the surface of ponds and off-channel river areas to improve the water quality in urban and rural neighbourhoods that otherwise tend to accumulate toxins.
Wastewater Lagoons
The purpose of lagoons is to collect, store, and treat wastewater over a period of time. They are
frequently used to treat
municipal and industrial wastewater ,where the waters are apparently stagnant, and to prevent leaks to
the groundwater below.
CFWs provide a valuable biological treatment option for lagoons that are particularly contaminated
with pollutants associated
with eutrophication4.
The implementation of Navanthus at both the regional and international levels is one of our primary goals. In Thessaly, we focus on Lake Karla and the Pineios river, both of which are suffering from eutrophication. Other environments in Greece that are affected by eutrophication and potentially benefit from our initiative include Lake Pamvotis5, as well as Lakes Mikri Prespa, Vistonis, and Ioannina6. At the European level, our proposal could have major application in the Baltic Sea, which is in a poor ecological status due to eutrophication, affecting >97% of its surface area7. Globally, freshwater ecosystems in the United States and China are able to employ Navanthus since eutrophication is such a serious problem in these regions. Among these are the Great Lakes in Canada8 as well as Lake Taihu in China9, both of which have high concentrations of Microcystis species during the summer months. However, due to legislative restrictions, we are unable to execute our idea at the national or European level at this moment. It is more feasible that our concept will be implemented in the future in the United States and China, where the legislation is more adaptable. More discussion of the relevant legislation is provided below in the challenges.
The size of the wetland we have designed is standardized and suitable for its application in freshwater. It has the form of a circular disk with a diameter of 1.15m ( 3.28 ft) and a height of 30cm (0.98 ft) with a total weight (weight of mycelium platform) of 158kg (348.3 lbs). It will have a total of 37 holes with a diameter of 3cm (0.098 ft), each of which will correspond to a plantlet of the genetically modified plant. Wetlands will be placed in tandem and the number of applied wetlands will depend on the extent of the phenomenon. The more extensive the phenomenon of eutrophication in the water body, the greater the number of wetlands we should apply.
Harmful algal blooms often occur in the late spring and summer season when water temperature is higher, providing a more hospitable environment for cyanobacteria to proliferate. Notably, microcystins, cyanotoxins that will be detected by our genetically engineered P. Australis plants begin their production at the end of spring. Therefore, we're choosing the warmer months to implement our monitoring and phytoremediation system, to detect eutrophication levels and combat algal blooms formation and Microcystins production at an early stage, eliminating further progression of the eutrophication phenomenon. As a biosafety precaution, in addition to the kill switch module that renders the seed sterile, we will restrict the platform's implementation period to the time beginning in early April and ending in late July. This is due to the fact that the blooming and cross-pollination period of the P. Australis plants begins in early August and extends through the fall10. The outcrossing of the GM plant is a major concern. For that purpose, we aim to use a biosafety module to avoid pollination of our plant and try to restrict the time frame during which the platform may be implemented.
Providing high ecological services to the public sector is the key to our team’s mission. Our idea consists of two components: a monitoring and a bioremediation system. The monitoring system, in addition to the real-time data that it would collect and store in the cloud, would be an extremely helpful tool for the scientific community that investigates the phenomenon of eutrophication. Open access to real-time monitoring data provides the necessary information interchange, and when managed properly, they become a useful tool for freshwater management planning. CFW, as a bioremediation concept, is aimed at both local authorities and international institutions for the preservation of freshwater ecosystems. Alternatively, NGOs and Ministries of the Environment could adopt the CFW strategy as a biodiversity-protecting solution. Collaboration between the government, non-government organizations, and the community is essential for the successful implementation of our idea.
As the majority of satellite monitoring systems are for coastal areas, monitoring of eutrophication levels in freshwater is insufficient. In addition, eutrophication-specific markers, such as microcystins, are lacking.
Characteristic examples are chemical interventions such as the use of copper sulfate (CuSO4), herbicides and treatment with algaecide or CuSO4 widely used as a universal and empirical method to remove or control phytoplankton blooms. In addition, the well-known sediment dredging method exposes unwanted toxic substances destroying the sediment environment.11
1. Monitoring System
Current water monitoring methods depend on the process of sampling and subsequent analysis in laboratories, which adds considerable time to the data providing process. Alternatives that rely on technologically advanced solutions such as programmed robots are expensive but highly efficient. Our RC Boat is an ergonomic and relatively simple solution to the problem of lack of large-scale data regarding the current state of water systems worldwide, which shows significantly reduced production costs compared to other corresponding methods. It provides real time data and fully characterizes the state of the waters, while at the same time this information is transferred directly to a web storage space (cloud) and can be available to the entire scientific community and water ecosystem protection agencies.
2. Constructed Floating Wetland
CFW vs. Traditional Systems
A variety of physical, chemical, and biological treatments have been employed in eutrophic water bodies. Remediation strategies based on physical and chemical methods are most suitable for smaller lakes and have immediate impacts on cleaning up eutrophic freshwater environments. However, these two methods cannot fundamentally solve the phenomenon of eutrophication due to costly and incomplete removal results. In addition, physical and chemical approaches have adverse impacts on an already degraded ecosystem by exposing undesirable toxic substances and destroying the sediment ecosystem. Biological treatments, on the other hand, are non-invasive, cost-effective, and sustainable strategies, but they have a prolonged lifespan. Phytoremediation provides a nature-based solution for restoration of local and global freshwaters. Our constructed floating Wetland is advantageous since it is eco-friendly, simple to operate, and more efficient at absorbing phosphorus than conventional wetlands.11
Improving Water Quality
CFWs rely on natural processes to biologically filter water, to manage algae, and remove excessive nutrients. The unique ecosystem they create has the ability to filter out harmful contaminants and recycle their nutrients into beneficial byproducts, saving our waters from contamination. The plants, during their development, are able to efficiently absorb nutrients and may also eliminate hazardous chemicals from their surrounding environment.
Protecting Biodiversity
CFW's primary mission is to ensure the preservation of aquatic life and habitats. Plant roots decrease phosphorus levels, which is crucial for the establishment of hazardous algal blooms, enabling us to first reestablish the native microbial community in the water. Clean water and balanced microbial communities are essential for aquatic species to survive and reproduce. This is how we preserve and enhance the biodiversity that has been reduced by eutrophication phenomena.
Sustainable Technology
Our goal is to develop an idea that can be effectively implemented without depleting natural resources for the future. This is why all components of the CFW and also the non electrical and mechanical parts of the RC Boat are made of natural, eco-friendly and biodegradable materials. To be considered as pioneers, we must ensure that our efforts have minimum negative environmental footprint even if our bioremediation efforts are successful.
Aesthetic Appeal
Floating wetlands are aesthetically satisfying because they provide a pleasant and relaxing view, acting as a kind of "urban oasis”. They are most necessary in degraded ecosystems where certain species are endangered or extinct. Floating islands have a natural way of separating smoothly the boundaries that humans have artificially created between land and water.
Step 1: Monitoring with RC Boat
The first step is to monitor the ecological status of the water body. Our monitoring system, R.A.S.A, is a remotely operated (RC) marine vessel using distributed ledger technology that is designed to analyze freshwater parameters such as eutrophication indicators. For that reason, the boat has multiple integrated sensors, including a pH sensor, dissolved oxygen (DO) sensor and a GPS to provide localization of pollution at each specific spot inside the operating water body. Our system provides on-site water analysis, in contrast to the sampling-analysis techniques already in use.
Step 2: Data evaluation & uploading
Data from the water body will be collected by our system and stored in a cloud for further evaluation. Wherever our data indicate critical levels of eutrophication, Constructed Floating Wetlands (CFW) will be implemented.
Step 3: Preparation of components
Basic requirements for the CFW to be used in an open-release environment:
- - Floating platform made of mycelium.
- - Greenhouse-grown GM Phragmites australis plants derived from transgenic seeds.
- - Filter to prevent the outflow of plant roots.
- - Placement of perimetric cellulose mesh supported by local reeds to prevent the outflow of plant pollen.
Step 4: Assembling the floating wetland
CFW assembly mostly requires a secure location with all the necessary biosafety measures. Because of this, assembly has to take place wherever the GM plants are cultivated. Our initial step in assembly is to install the mycelium platform, which serves as our base. Each Phragmites australis plantlet should then be planted in a separate CFW hole. The nets must be added last since, otherwise, the structure would be too complex to assemble. After that, we will have to package and transport the constructed floating wetland to the operating source of freshwater. Finally, the water body has an artificial wetland that is completely functioning and established.
Step 5: Incubation period
The CFW will have a 4-month incubation period, typically between April and July. In the meantime, a maintenance service for our construction should be provided. Surveillance (e.g., at least quarterly) is essential, particularly during the early plant establishing stage, in order to verify the health and development of the plants and take corrective action as required. After initial monitoring of plant development, the shoots should be trimmed and removed from the CFW.
Step 6: Systematic monitoring of CFW's action
After the implementation of CFW's, water monitoring using R.A.S.A is necessary in order to better understand their performance.
Step 7: CFW withdrawal
After the CFW's life cycle is over and the measurements confirm that eutrophic indicators are now at normal, non-eutrophic levels, we can remove the CFW.
Step 8: Recycling
Our constructed floating wetlands can be recycled when their application cycle is completed. We have ensured that all the individual parts that make up our wetlands are 100% compostable and recyclable. In particular, after the bioremediation process, Phragmites australis plants, the mycelium-made platform as well as the cellulose mesh will be sent to a special processing and recycling unit with the aim of converting them into biomass. Phragmites australis plants will be utilized for the production of fertilizer, providing a phosphorus-recycling pathway. Composting12 appears to be an effective method for removing genetically modified plant material, including DNA-encoding transgenes, and is therefore a potential mechanism for converting GM plants to biomass for the production of commercial fertilizers. Furthermore, the mycelium platform and cellulose mesh will be utilized for the energy coverage of local industrial units or possibly the production of biofuels.
Safety Considerations
Our endeavor is based on GM plants for non-food or non-feed purposes13. "Deliberate release" means any intentional introduction into the environment of a GMO or a combination of GMOs for which no specific containment measures are used to limit their contact with and to provide a high level of safety for the general population and the environment. Existing guidelines on the environmental risk assessment of GM plants is considered adequate; however, our knowledge of the regulation of Programmed Cell Death in plants remains limited14, thus an extra focus should be paid to concerns like gene transfer and the exposure of non-target species, especially wildlife grazing on these GM plants. Risk management techniques, such post-market environmental monitoring, standard manufacturing protocols, or confinement strategies to reduce exposure to the genetically modified plant, are increasingly important.
Legislation Frame
The worldwide policy landscape of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) displays divergence rather than convergence. The United States stands on one side as strong advocates through approval and production by being a world leader in GM plant cultivation, while the European Union, on the other side, places strict regulation on GMOs 15,16. While Japan, Canada and China17,18 have approved a great number of GMOs, other countries including France, Greece, Italy and Poland use a national ban on GMO cultivation as a measure to prevent contamination of the supply chain. Consequently, if we aim to execute our proposal in the future, we must approach nations that permit the development of our GM Plant and comply with the international agreement: Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety19, which seeks to ensure the safe handling, transport, and use of live modified organisms originating from modern biotechnology.
Bioethics
The ethical issues emerging from scientific advancements will always be an ongoing problem that needs to be addressed. While designing project “Navanthus” we considered the following ethical factors. It is well known that the GMO implementation has caused several controversies among the scientific community and the public. Its cost and its effects on human health and the environment are main concerns that have arisen during the years and have resulted in the reluctance of the application. However, the advancement of technology and life sciences have given answers to these controversies and have provided the world with new opportunities and solutions to modern problems. Synthetic Biology projects are a typical example of GMO implementation ameliorating and possibly tackling long term problems. It is in our hands to take advantage of scientific advances, such as GMOs and use them properly in order to solve problems such as eutrophication that can severely affect human, animal and environmental health.
Weather Conditions
Both Constructed Floating Wetlands and the Remote Controlled Boat have been designed in accordance with the features and climatic circumstances of the bodies of water to which they will be applied. We have ensured a preservative safety factor of the inertia and buoyancy by setting in our calculations the maximum values of these parameters. More specifically,
- Water and air temperature: T=25(°C)
- Air type: Moist air
- Relative humidity: 100%
- Air density: d=1.16992 kg/m³
- Maximum air velocity: v=4m/s
How will CFW remain stationary ?
The nature of the phytoremediation method is based on placing several wetlands in the same place, which will be connected to each other and to the banks. Furthermore, the inertia of our CFW's lies in their mechanical design. The use of a conservative factor of safety in the construction's weight ensures that, even at high wind speeds (corresponding to already recorded speeds in lakes and rivers of Greece) the platform will be able to remain in the position in which it was placed.
References
- portal.cybertaxonomy.org/flora-greece/
- Jeannine MLessmann, et al. Effect of climatic gradients on the photosynthetic responses of four Phragmites australis populations. Aquatic Botany, April 2001.
- wetlandinfo.des.qld.gov.au/wetlands/management/treatment-systems
- United States, Environmental Protection Agency, Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet.
- Maria Peppa, Christos Vasilakos and Dimitris Kavroudakis, Eutrophication Monitoring for Lake Pamvotis, Greece, Using Sentinel-2 Data. ISPRS Int., Feb 2020.
- Ierotheos Zacharias et al., Greek Lakes: Limnological overview. Lakes & Reservoirs, April 2002.
- stateofthebalticsea.helcom.fi/pressures-and-their-status/eutrophication
- Hailey Horachek et al., Algal Blooms In The Great Lakes: Consequences, Governance And Solutions. UBC Geography, 2015.
- Boqiang Qin, et al., Spatiotemporal Changes of Cyanobacterial Bloom in Large Shallow Eutrophic Lake Taihu, China. March 2018.
- United States, Department of Agriculture, COMMON REED Phragmites australis Plant Guide. Aug 2012
- Yuan Zhang, et al., Control and remediation methods for eutrophic lakes in the past 30 years. Water Science & Technology, May 2020.
- Tim Reuter, et al., Biodegradation of genetically modified seeds and plant tissues during composting. Science of Food and Agriculture, Feb 2010.
- European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy, Scientific Opinion on Guidance for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants used for non-food or non-feed purposes. April 2009.
- Anna Daneva, et al., Functions and Regulation of Programmed Cell Death in Plant Development. Oct 2016.
- Wendan Wang, International Regulations on Genetically Modified Organisms: U.S., Europe, China and Japan. AgBioForum18(1):44–54, June 2016.
- isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/approvedeventsin/default.asp?CountryID=JP
- Jiao Feng and Fan Yang, The Regulation of Genetically Modified Food in China. Biotechnology Law ReportVol. 38, No. 5, Oct 2019.
- bch.cbd.int/protocol
- Natalia Pavlineri, et al., Constructed Floating Wetlands: A review of research, design, operation and management aspects, and data meta-analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal Volume 308, Jan 2017.
- Ekaterini Hadjisolomou, et al., Assessment of the Eutrophication-Related Environmental Parameters in Two Mediterranean Lakes by Integrating Statistical Techniques and Self-Organizing Maps. Environmental Science and Engineering, March 2018.