Human Practices

Overview


Integrated Human Practices works helped us define the current issues and improve the hardware design from different perspectives. CUHKSZ team has communicated with the food industry and testing company to find out the current needs for testing in a fast and convenient way. Communicating with professors has benefited the hardware to define a suitable method for detecting the concentration.

ihp

EVALUATION

MED Research Day

Our team also participated in the MED Research Day, a research forum for young scientists held by the School of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen. This forum required an academic poster containing a series of elements of a published paper, which directed us to complement and present our project more systematically. We further delivered an oral presentation to a group of experienced professors and graduate students, to whom we exchanged the latest research outcomes and received a significant amount of guidance and help.

 (1A)
 (1B)
 (1C)

Specifically, a professor pointed out the latent interference of detection brought by the complicated internal environment of cells, promoting us to improve our sensor's selectivity for nitrite. Another senior appreciated the innovation of directly immobilizing bacterial cells but showed concerns about maintaining cell viability. Our team was then inspired to combine hydrogel and the freezing-drying method to achieve long-term storage. Moreover, we shared the spirit of iGEM and its impact on undergraduate researchers with the audience, winning us second place in the best presentation and the best poster prizes. It is also worth noting that the keynote speaker of this event shared his latest research progress in the field of quantitative synthetic biology. He also shared his thoughts on the future of synthetic biology, from the white box paradigm to the black box paradigm led by artificial intelligence.

 1E
 (1D)

By attending such a seminar, our team got in touch with the advanced knowledge and researchers in synthetic biology and developed a more profound understanding of our project.

Questionnaire from the Public

To understand how the public comprehends our project Nitrisensor and the current hot field of synthetic biology, our team designed a short questionnaire. The education level of the respondents was high school or above.

In the Nitrisensor part, the questionnaire first introduced our project, which aims to design a test strip based on E. coli that can quickly detect the nitrite content of the tested substance. The first question in this part investigated the public attitude towards nitrite poisoning events in recent years.

Over 75 percent of respondents were worried about the problem of undetected excessive nitrite in daily food. While about 23 percent of respondents considered that people poisoning from nitrite overdose was a rare event, and they did not need to pay too much attention.

2A
2B

Then we investigated the attitude of the public towards our project Nitrisensor. About 80 percent of respondents were willing to utilize our device to detect the nitrite level in daily food. They considered that applying this product could ensure the security of food and life to some extent. About 20 percent of respondents conceded that our project has an optimistic starting point. At the same time, they doubted the safety and accuracy of the technology. Only one respondent regarded this project as superfluous.

(2C)

For the acceptance of more sensors which include but are not limited to food and agriculture for different components in the future, about 95 percent of respondents were willing to accept. In contrast, three respondents held an unsure attitude. In conclusion, the majority of the respondents were willing to apply our test strip to practical detection. In addition, almost all the respondents held an optimistic attitude toward the sensor technology, which can be applied to quality inspection.

Considering the attitude toward the application of synthetic biology at the environmental and ecological level, about 80 percent of respondents considered that synthetic biology was worth being carried forward. The discipline illustrated that synthetic biology is connected with the optimal solution's moral rules and natural law. Five respondents considered that synthetic biology was still a theory. The discipline was valid in an experiment but did not guarantee its validity in reality. Another five respondents held a relatively pessimistic viewpoint. They suggested that there is a risk of biological leakage. Thus, it is necessary to strengthen corresponding biosafety supervision. The rest respondents did not have certain degrees of understanding of this aspect.

2d
2e

It is worth mentioning that 97 percent of respondents are willing to understand synthetic biology further.