Experiments

overview

Overview

This year, the McGill iGEM team has compiled all of our protocols and safety into the following PDF.

McGill 2022 Protocols.pdf

Troubleshooting GCMS.pdf

Keep scrolling to discover our experiment notebook interactively!

During this week, the lab was set up and proper safety orientation and training was conducted with all lab members.

No experiments were run.

Chassis Engineering
+

Three E. coli backbone BioBricks (pBS1C, pBS2E, and pBS4S) and promoters (Pveg, PliaG, and PlepA) were miniprepped and used to create glycerol stocks.2,3,4

B. subtilis was rehydrated and cultures were continually restreaked and maintained throughout the course of the project.

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

The two E. coli backbones and three E. coli promoters underwent restriction enzyme digestion and ligation to create six ligation combinations: pBS1C + Pveg, pBS1C + PliaG, pBS1C + PlepA, pBS4S + Pveg, pBS4S + PliaG, pBS4S + PlepA 2,5,6

The pBS1C + Pveg ligation was transformed into competent E. coli cells.8 DNA gel electrophoresis was performed to verify successful ligation products, which were then replated.7

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

The remaining five ligation combinations (pBS1C + PliaG, pBS1C + PlepA, pBS4S + Pveg, pBS4S + PliaG, pBS4S + PlepA) were transformed into competent E. coli cells.2,8 DNA gel electrophoresis was performed to verify successful ligation products, which were then miniprepped, replated and used to create glycerol stocks.3,4,7

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

The miniprep products of the six verified ligation products (i.e., pBS1C + Pveg, pBS1C + PliaG, pBS1C + PlepA, pBS4S + Pveg, pBS4S + PliaG, pBS4S + PlepA) were quantified.

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

The pBS1C + Pveg ligation and MFS transporter plasmids underwent restriction enzyme digestion and ligation, eventually being transformed into competent E. coli cells. 5,6,8 Colony PCR was performed for ten colonies to verify successful ligation products.9 Three successful ligations were identified and miniprepped.3

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

The miniprep products of the three successful pBS1C + Pveg + MFS ligations were quantified.

The MFS transporter plasmid was transformed, liquid cultured, miniprepped, and quantified.3

The remaining five verified ligation products underwent restriction enzyme digestion and ligation.5,6The ligations were transformed into competent E. coli cells.8

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Colony PCR was performed for five colonies of each of the ligations to verify successful ligation products.9Successful ligations were identified, miniprepped, and quantified.3

B. subtilis was prepared for electrocompetization - a first attempt was made to transform the six backbone-promoter-MFS ligations but the electroporator arced and killed the B. subtilis.17

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

More B. subtilis was prepared for electrocompetization with some adjustments to the protocol.1

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

A second attempt was made to transform the linearized backbone + promoter + MFS ligations into the electrocompetent B. subtilis, but the electroporator still arced.17

Chemically competent B. subtilis was prepared and the same transformations were attempted, but the bacteria did not grow on the plates. 18

More successful ligations of backbone + promoter + MFS were miniprepped.3

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Chemically competent B. subtilis was prepared a second time with modified conditions, and the same transformations were attempted.18 A lawn of bacteria grew and they were inoculated into liquid cultures containing chloramphenicol for pBS1C backbones and spectinomycin for pBS4S backbones. Nothing grew, confirming our hypothesis that they were not transformed.
A third attempt was made to chemically competize and transform B. subtilis using the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center protocol. However, some transformations either did not grow or formed a film. A third attempt was made to electrocompetize B. subtilis, and the DNA linearizations were PCR purified before transformation.11,17 Although some colonies grew, the negative control was contaminated so we disregarded these results.

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Chemically competent B. subtilis was made again and the growth was more carefully monitored.18 All the promoter + backbone + MFS ligations were transformed and some grew. Colony PCR was performed once but the liquid cultures grew very slowly.9 Colony PCR was performed again and none of the electrocompetent or chemical competent B. subtilis worked.9

We ordered supercompetent B. subtilis to retry the transformation.

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Mannitol supercompetent B. subtilis was prepared and transformed, but the colonies grew poorly on the plates.19

We attempted to transform pBS1C+Pveg+MFS a second time, more dilutions were plated. The successful colonies were verified via colony PCR and we finally transformed pBS1C + Pveg + MFS into B. subtilis!9

The other 5 promoter + backbone + MFS ligations were attempted with mannitol supercompetent B. subtilis.19The same procedure was followed but only pBS4S + Pveg + MFS worked.

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Xylose supercompetent B. subtilis was prepared and the 4 remaining combinations (pBS1C+PliaG, pBS1C+PlepA, pBS4S+PliaG, pBS4S+Plep) were transformed.20 Only pBS1C + PlepA + M grew, and the colonies were verified to be successful using colony PCR.9

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

A second and final attempt at transforming the remaining 3 promoter+backbone+MFS was made. However, the colony PCR showed no successful transformation.9

Following a CFU to OD600 standardization, a failed cholesterol uptake assay using colorimetric quantification was performed.26

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Another modified cholesterol uptake assay was attempted, giving good standards. However, the bacteria interfered with the colorimetric assay, causing inaccurate results.26

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Fluorometric cholesterol uptake assay was attempted.26Although the standard deviations were large, B. subtilis with MFS clearly uptook more cholesterol than the E. coli control.

To create our biobrick, pJUMP28 and Phag were ligated and transformed into NEB DH10b.27

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

More replicates for the fluorometric cholesterol assay were attempted to lower the standard deviation.26 B. subtilis with MFS appeared to make no significant difference in cholesterol uptake, but wild-type B. subtilis uptakes more than E. coli.3,9

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Gibson assembly was performed to create our biobrick pBSChag, an integrative vector that integrates into flgM site in B. subtilis that encodes for flagellum genes.24,31 Backbone and inserts fragments were PCR amplified and purified, DpnI restriction digest verified successful amplification for Gibson assembly.4,11

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

pBSChag Gibson product was transformed into BL21 twice unsuccessfully.12 Endura electrocompetent E. coli was used for transformation, which worked. Colony PCR confirmed successful transformation.9

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Sequencing results for pBSChag Gibson product confirmed successful Gibson assembly with no mutations.

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

Phag was cloned into pBSChag via restriction digestion with EcoRI and PstI, ligated with T4 DNA ligase, then transformed into OneShot TOP10 cells.5,8 Successful colonies were verified via diagnostic restriction digestion with EcoRI and PstI.5

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

No experiments were run in this project portion this week.

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+
Chassis Engineering
+

No experiments were run in this project portion this week.

Cholesterol Enzymatic Pathway
+
B. subtilis Genetic Pathway
+

References

  1. Plasmid: pPROEX HTb. In: Addgene. https://www.addgene.org/vector-database/3835/
  2. Popp, P. F., Dotzler, M., Radeck, J., Bartels, J., & Mascher, T. (2017). The Bacillus BioBrick Box 2.0: expanding the genetic toolbox for the standardized work with Bacillus subtilis. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 15058. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15107-z
  3. ThermoFisher Scientific. (2012). GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep Kit. https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/MAN0012655_GeneJET_Plasmid_Miniprep_UG.pdf
  4. Thean, R. K., Ong, D. X., Heng, Z. S., Gan, S. K., & Yeo, J. Y. (2021). To Plate or to Simply Unfreeze, That Is the Question for Optimal Plasmid Extraction. Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 32(2), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.7171/jbt.20-3203-001
  5. ThermoFisher Scientific. (2012). Fast Digestion of DNA. https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/manuals/MAN0012413_Fast_Digestion_DNA_UG.pdf&title=VXNlciBHdWlkZTogRmFzdCBEaWdlc3Rpb24gb2YgRE5B
  6. ThermoFisher Scientific. (2012). Rapid DNA Ligation Kit. https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fmanuals%2FMAN0012709_Rapid_DNA_Ligation_UG.pdf
  7. Addgene. (2018). Agarose Gel Electrophoresis. https://www.addgene.org/protocols/gel-electrophoresis/
  8. Invitrogen OneShot TOP10 Chemically Competent E. Coli. Fisher Scientific. https://www.fishersci.ca/shop/products/invitrogen-one-shot-top10-chemically-competent-i-e-coli-i-high-copy-plasmid-3/p-4925027
  9. ThermoFisher Scientific. (2017). Direct PCR from bacterial and yeast cells using Platinum SuperFi DNA Polymerase. https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/brochures/pcr-bacteria-yeast-platinum-superfi-dna-polymerase-app-note.pdf
  10. Heckman, K., Pease, L. Gene splicing and mutagenesis by PCR-driven overlap extension. Nat Protoc 2, 924–932 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.132
  11. ThermoFisher Scientific. (2015) GeneJET PCR Purification Kit. https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fmanuals%2FMAN0012662_GeneJET_PCR_Purification_UG.pdf
  12. ThermoFisher Scientific. (2019). BL21(DE3) Competent Cells. https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fmanuals%2FMAN0018595_BL21_DE3competent_cells_UG.pdf
  13. Mahmood, T., & Yang, P. C. (2012). Western blot: technique, theory, and trouble shooting. North American journal of medical sciences, 4(9), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.100998
  14. Briand, L., Marcion, G., Kriznik, A. et al. A self-inducible heterologous protein expression system in Escherichia coli. Sci Rep 6, 33037 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33037
  15. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
  16. Steinberg, T.H. Protein Gel Staining Methods: An Introduction and Overview,Methods in Enzymology (2009) Academic Press,Volume 463, Pages 541-563, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(09)63031-7.
  17. Eppendorf. (2003).Transformation Protocol: Bacillus Subtilis Electroporation. https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/b0/Protocol_for_preparation_of_Competent_Bisubtilis_Cells..pdf
  18. iGEM LMU-Munich 2014. Transformation of Bacillus subtilis (simple), https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/c/c2/LMU_Munich14_Transformation_of_Bacillus_subtilis.pdf
  19. Rahmer, R., Morabbi Heravi, K., & Altenbuchner, J. (2015). Construction of a Super-Competent Bacillus subtilis 168 Using the P mtlA -comKS Inducible Cassette. Front Microbiol, 6, 1431. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01431
  20. Zhang, X. Z., & Zhang, Y. H. P. (2011). Simple, fast and high‐efficiency transformation system for directed evolution of cellulase in Bacillus subtilis. Microbial biotechnology, 4(1), 98-105.
  21. ThermoFisher Scientific. (2012) HisPur™ Cobalt Purification Kit https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fmanuals%2FMAN0011630_HisPur_Cobalt_Purifi_UG.pdf
  22. Simpson R. J. (2010). Large-scale extraction of recombinant proteins from bacteria. Cold Spring Harbor protocols, 2010(9), pdb.prot5484. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5484
  23. Wan, P.J., Dowd, M.K., Thomas, A.E. et al. Trimethylsilyl Derivatization/Gas Chromatography as a Method to Determine the Free Fatty Acid Content of Vegetable Oils. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 84, 701–708 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-007-1101-1
  24. ThermoFisher Scientific. (2020). GeneArt Gibson Assembly HiFi Cloning Kits User Guide. https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/manuals/MAN0019062_GeneArtGibsonHiFi_UG.pdf
  25. Singh, A., Upadhyay, V., Upadhyay, A.K. et al. Protein recovery from inclusion bodies of Escherichia coli using mild solubilization process. Microb Cell Fact 14, 41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0222-8
  26. Abcam. Cholesterol/ Cholesteryl Ester Assay Kit - Quantitation (ab65359) https://www.abcam.com/cholesterol-cholesteryl-ester-assay-kit-quantitation-ab65359.html
  27. New England BioLabs. NEB® Stable Competent E. coli (High Efficiency) (2022) https://international.neb.com/protocols/2013/10/30/high-efficiency-transformation-protocol-c3040h
  28. Chen, M., Drury, J. E., & Penning, T. M. (2011). Substrate specificity and inhibitor analyses of human steroid 5β-reductase (AKR1D1). Steroids, 76(5), 484-490.
  29. DTU Denmark. (2017). Sonic lysis of E. Coli for protein extraction. https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/1/1c/T--DTU-Denmark--protocols-lysis-of-Ecoli-cells.pdf
  30. Le, H.H., Lee, MT., Besler, K.R. et al. Characterization of interactions of dietary cholesterol with the murine and human gut microbiome. Nat Microbiol 7, 1390–1403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01195-9
  31. Abbott, Z. (2018), Gene expression system for probiotic microorganisms, US10849938B2. https://patents.google.com/patent/US10849938B2/#patentCitations
  32. Butt, T. R., Edavettal, S. C., Hall, J. P., & Mattern, M. R. (2005). SUMO fusion technology for difficult-to-express proteins. Protein expression and purification, 43(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pep.2005.03.016

Explore